Các bảo quản viên có thể bỏ cấm họ về mặt kỹ thuật bằng cách này, nhưng tuyệt đối ''không'' nên làm như vậy, trừ khi họ bị cấm tự động do dùng chung IP với một số thành viên (hoặc bot) bị cấm. Nếu không, nếu bảo quản viên cảm thấy mình bị cấm mà không có lý do hợp lệ, họ nên liên hệ với bảo quản viên đã đặt lệnh cấm, hoặc một bảo quản viên khác, hoặc qua danh sách thư và yêu cầu bỏ cấm.
If you disagree with a block ===
If you disagree with a block placed by another admin, please contact that admin to discuss the matter. Some reasons you might want to unblock would be:
* The user was blocked in violation of this policy
* The reason for the block no longer applies
Bear in mind that blocked users commonly e-mail several admins claiming to be the victims of persecution by a biased admin. Because it is not always obvious from the blocked user's edit history what the problem was, '''it is a matter of courtesy and common sense to consult the blocking admin, rather than performing the unblock yourself'''.
Exceptions to this would be where an unambiguous error has been made (not a judgment call) and the blocking admin is not online: for example, if a user was blocked for 3RR, but there were clearly only three reverts. If you feel that such an error has been made, and the blocking admin is not available, you must notify the blocking admin on his or her talk page '''and''' the rest of the administrator community at [[Wikisource:Administrator's noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]] that you are unblocking a blocked user, '''before doing so'''.
Admins should be careful not to unblock themselves in order to circumvent a block (unless it is an IP block to prevent vandalism), as a temporary revocation of administrator access ("desysopping") is the only way to ensure that this does not continue.
=== Controversial blocks ===